SECNAVINST 1850.4E - NAVY DISABILITY EVALUATION MANUAL

Discussion in 'Navy/US Marine Corps Info' started by brianwl, Jun 4, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. brianwl

    brianwl PEB Forum Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
    Messages:
    135
    Trophy Points:
    33
  2. Jason Perry

    Jason Perry Benevolent Leader Site Founder Staff Member PEB Forum Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2007
    Messages:
    11,318
    Trophy Points:
    1,225
    SECNAVINST 1850.4E

    Attached is the Sec. Navy Instruction 1850.4E, Navy Disability Evaluation Manual. This covers PEBs. Chapter 8 contains the standards of fitness for retention (i.e., what conditions require referral to MEB).
     

    Attached Files:

  3. VAJumper

    VAJumper PEB Forum Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2008
    Messages:
    405
    Trophy Points:
    33
    SECNAVINST 1850.4E

    I just found this manual while researching for someone online. In this manual is a list of analogous codes the Navy uses to rate disabilities that aren't in the VASRD--yet. This could really help someone whose code isn't listed to find out at least what the Navy standard is and what an approximate rating would be.
     
  4. Jason Perry

    Jason Perry Benevolent Leader Site Founder Staff Member PEB Forum Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2007
    Messages:
    11,318
    Trophy Points:
    1,225
    SECNAVINST 1850.4E

    There is also a similar Table of Analogous Codes (TAC) in the since rescinded DoDI 1332.39. I do use both as a reference and starting point for an analysis of potential likely appropriate ratings (another resource you can use is searching Board for Veterans Appeals decisions for rare/unlisted conditions and see what the VA used to rate these conditions). The only point I would add, though, is that when using an analogous code, there may be more than one way (and more than one applicable appropriate analogous code) to rate a condition...in these cases, the member should be rated at the higher of the two ratings under either criteria. The point is that this can be a complex issue, so I would definitely say it makes sense to reference the TACs, just keep in mind that these tables are not binding. If you deserve more under another proper code, that is what you should receive.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page