CRSC- any insight from PACT ACT experienced appreciated

scottymotech

PEB Forum Regular Member
PEB Forum Veteran
Registered Member
Preferably vets who have first hand experience with CRSC claims with PACT ACT. How did it go? Did they grant or deny? What did you claim? Reason for grant or denial.

I am getting ready to wade in the CRSC arena. I am so used to fighting, that I feel weird when there isn’t a fight such as my most recent and maybe last VA claim. They treated it as a supplemental and labeled it such which is wrong. It was a new claim for new not previously claimed conditions. That’s literally the only issue, and really a non issue. Claim was decided in about 110 days. So this is my first claim not backlogged. They granted more than I was expecting, so I am not appealing. I am already 100 P&T. I also was granted medical retirement 5 years retro PDBR. Also won a a long appeal that went to the BVA went from 20 to 100. So I am used to fighting, but also prevailing.

I submitted an Intent to File about a year ago when the doctor said rhinitis after complaints of breathing knowing that’s a pact presumption. Months later got a CT scan. Sinusitis. Submit the claim within a month of the CT scan. Less than 2 weeks and I am having a C&P for sinusitis and rhinitis. I didn’t think they would grant rhinitis. Thought I would get low balled sinusitis, like 0% or 10%. When I got the decision 30% sinusitis and 10% rhinitis. The letter says “has been awarded on the basis of this presumption. Cites all the Pact boiler plate CFRs and USC. Shockingly easy claim.

Now I am looking at what my intent of this claim was in the first place, CRSC. Seems presumptive claims can be tricky. I am reading to select IW not GW for example. Any insight and advise is appreciated. I plan to package a complete claim up nice and neat.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3473.jpeg
    IMG_3473.jpeg
    503.4 KB · Views: 19
  • IMG_3472.jpeg
    IMG_3472.jpeg
    400.2 KB · Views: 19
Well nothing heard. Did reach out the Army “ambassadors” and they just bounce me between two phone numbers and then the person goes to the VA VSO lookup site. So yeah that’s a misleading bust.
 
I was approved for rhinitis, sinusitis, asthma, and a number of other things. The PACT stuff was all approved under IW. Navy, cause I know all the services interpret CRSC differently.
 
I was approved for rhinitis, sinusitis, asthma, and a number of other things. The PACT stuff was all approved under IW. Navy, cause I know all the services interpret CRSC differently.
I appreciate it. This helps and the same advice I am hearing, file under IW.

Did you get help or go it alone. Did you submit things like your Code Sheet and Disability Benefits questionnaire.

Well the laws governing CRSC does not vary by service, only that the services have to adjudicate CRSC claims.
 
I filed myself. I’ve helped a few other people file as well.

All the services are required to pull your VA code sheet. They will get it much faster than you.

The only documents I submitted were a few pages from my STR, DD214 and PEB paperwork.

I had to apply a second time to get PTSD approved. They wanted to read the summary of action on my awards and not just see them on my DD214.

Agreed, the law is the law but the way a body interprets it absolutely varies.
 
I filed myself. I’ve helped a few other people file as well.

All the services are required to pull your VA code sheet. They will get it much faster than you.

The only documents I submitted were a few pages from my STR, DD214 and PEB paperwork.

I had to apply a second time to get PTSD approved. They wanted to read the summary of action on my awards and not just see them on my DD214.

Agreed, the law is the law but the way a body interprets it absolutely varies.
I wish all services actually did that, AF, for one, will reject your packet if you don't provide it yourself. Army has been straightforward with it and will review the conditions for any PACT Act presumptives (or any other obvious items, such as Tinnitus) without the items being claimed. Navy, couldn't tell you. And that last sentence is factual, even though, allegedly, DOD IG has done a review of Army's processes when it comes to CRSC, not sure on the other two services even though I have reached out on numerous occasions to both.
 
I was approved for rhinitis, sinusitis, asthma, and a number of other things. The PACT stuff was all approved under IW. Navy, cause I know all the services interpret CRSC differently.

Can you please help me out? On my 2860, I am going to explain in section (j)

“Applying for CRSC based on a 60% disability rating for Asthma as a presumptive disability under the PACT Act because of toxic exposure to burn pits in Somalia during Operation Restore Hope”

Based on your experience with CRSC with the Navy for asthma, does my explanation sound good? Or do you have any suggestions? I am only applying for the 60% PACT Act presumptive for asthma because that gets me at my max for CRSC

Thanks, Shimaze

PS> That is not really my SSN so no worries. And I was not a SEAL in the Navy. Everyone else was, but not me. I was boots on the ground in Somalia in 1992~93 during Operation Restore Hope

2860 Section IV.jpg
 
Can you please help me out? On my 2860, I am going to explain in section (j)

“Applying for CRSC based on a 60% disability rating for Asthma as a presumptive disability under the PACT Act because of toxic exposure to burn pits in Somalia during Operation Restore Hope”

Based on your experience with CRSC with the Navy for asthma, does my explanation sound good? Or do you have any suggestions? I am only applying for the 60% PACT Act presumptive for asthma because that gets me at my max for CRSC

Thanks, Shimaze

PS> That is not really my SSN so no worries. And I was not a SEAL in the Navy. Everyone else was, but not me. I was boots on the ground in Somalia in 1992~93 during Operation Restore Hope

View attachment 11584
You don't need anything further than that for 13j
 
Can you please help me out? On my 2860, I am going to explain in section (j)

“Applying for CRSC based on a 60% disability rating for Asthma as a presumptive disability under the PACT Act because of toxic exposure to burn pits in Somalia during Operation Restore Hope”

Based on your experience with CRSC with the Navy for asthma, does my explanation sound good? Or do you have any suggestions? I am only applying for the 60% PACT Act presumptive for asthma because that gets me at my max for CRSC

Thanks, Shimaze

PS> That is not really my SSN so no worries. And I was not a SEAL in the Navy. Everyone else was, but not me. I was boots on the ground in Somalia in 1992~93 during Operation Restore Hope

View attachment 11584
The navy will pull your VA code sheet. They will approve anything on your code sheet that qualifies for CRSC even if you don’t put it in the application.. provided they don’t need any amplifying information. Even if your disability code(s) are wrong it won’t impact your approval since they will reference your code sheet.
 
The navy will pull your VA code sheet. They will approve anything on your code sheet that qualifies for CRSC even if you don’t put it in the application.. provided they don’t need any amplifying information. Even if your disability code(s) are wrong it won’t impact your approval since they will reference your code sheet.
Glad to see the Navy does this along with the Army. The only one that screwed with the Veteran is the Air Force and they folded strictly to the line that the asthma has to be diagnosed six months after the veterans out of military, which absolutely stupid individual goes through the IDES process.
 
Glad to see the Navy does this along with the Army. The only one that screwed with the Veteran is the Air Force and they folded strictly to the line that the asthma has to be diagnosed six months after the veterans out of military, which absolutely stupid individual goes through the IDES process.

That's wild that the air force interprets asthma like that. The Navy does some interesting things as well but their biggest problem is staffing. Not sure if they have remedied that issue or if its even considered an issue for them. I would ask but the guy I knew that was an admin assistant on their boards has since left his position.
 
That's wild that the air force interprets asthma like that. The Navy does some interesting things as well but their biggest problem is staffing. Not sure if they have remedied that issue or if its even considered an issue for them. I would ask but the guy I knew that was an admin assistant on their boards has since left his position.
Unfortunately that’s how the presumptive for asthma is written by the VA so they take it verbatim
 
You would think it would be the opposite and they would want to see the diagnosis before leaving service and nothing pulmonary related on the entry physical.
There go bring in that term “thinking” into the picture lol. Just poorly worded in the presumptives when they passed it. They don’t think about those who are chapter 61 disability retirees getting out with less than 20 years.
 
Top