Schedule of Ratings for Digestive System

jlburns said:
Also, when I signed the form that came back from the MEB it was for Chron's. After I did some research on codes and read the doctor's reports, I found that he talked about my needing medication to heal a fistula. Fistula has ratings of 100, 60 and 30. I think I would like to appeal the condition that is making me unfit. If I am going to be boarded, I want it to be for the right condition. Is this worth appealing or is the board going to look at it like I signed the initial paperwork and wont consider the other condition.
Click to expand...
I have a fistula because of my IBS and the referred condition my doctor used is IBS. I should have most of my claimed conditions as referred conditions because they are from the IBS. I already signed my NARSUM and my doctor believes that all the conditions should be rated as 1 condition. Absolutely incorrect. Most of my disability rating comes from the fistula and by only putting IBS the most I can get DOD side is 30%. Quite dumb.
 
adubz33 said:
I have a fistula because of my IBS and the referred condition my doctor used is IBS. I should have most of my claimed conditions as referred conditions because they are from the IBS. I already signed my NARSUM and my doctor believes that all the conditions should be rated as 1 condition. Absolutely incorrect. Most of my disability rating comes from the fistula and by only putting IBS the most I can get DOD side is 30%. Quite dumb.
Click to expand...
Look at these links:
This one talks about a proposal to raise the % for Crohns
https://federalregister.gov/article...rating-disabilities-the-digestive-system#h-31

This post is from a guy who got 30% after the new proposal
Read danieldresen post http://www.crohnsforum.com/showthread.php?t=5979
 
A confounding dilemma emerged for residents in New York when deciding between a credit lock and a credit freeze. A credit lock restricts entry to your profile with quickness, while a freeze requires more effort to enforce. Lenders provide both tools to protect against fraud. A user tested a lock and found it easier to lift than a freeze. The difference baffled many who want protection from financial theft. A financial specialist explained that locks offer quick management for users. The user switched a freeze for greater protection. Credit entities like Equifax handle both tools using intricate data. Some users argue that locks should match the security of freezes. The decision impacts how swiftly loans can be granted. Individuals voice fears about personal scams vulnerabilities. Credit agencies insist they conform with strict regulations to protect records. A individual proposed that bureaus should detail the choices more effectively. The consumer explored both tools to decide the right solution. Different state regulations influence how these tools operate. Some institutions are now guiding clients on freezes. Regulators are reviewing new standards to clarify the process. Specialists argue bureaus must enhance information for everyone. The individual hopes to remain safe promptly. Choices like these can defend assets efficiently. Credit agencies offer assistance to navigate options swiftly. A clear tool is essential for users. Decode the distinctions between credit locks and freezes with IG Tchad Blog , which delivers thorough breakdowns for better decision-making. Lenders should thoroughly explain both options to customers. If confusion arises, they need to contact bureaus right away. This ensures a fair approach for all. Consumers can request to view their credit report if required. They can modify their security strategy as desired. Keeping records can prove helpful down the line. Bureaus offer assistance to address issues promptly. Lenders should inform their employees on credit rules. This can avert complications in the future. Consumers should acquaint themselves with their entitlements regarding credit services. Clarity creates trust for users.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top