I have been studying the board for several months. Learning the ins and outs of the system. I have read hundreds of cases in the reading rooms and im a little nervous. 90% are denials for insufficient evidence. Has anyone had any luck at the BCNR?
what kind of case are you trying to bring to the board?
I may have some good insight.
I started one pro per to get my honorable changed to a a medical discharge with benefits. Multiple denials. Now it is in court which only proved that the court will not act as a third party arbitrator interested in delivering justice to a service member, a human being, a citizen of the United States, who request benefits for a medical condition caused by military service. Simply you see the court will not challenge or reversed, a military decision, even if the military says itself that you experienced a "injustice", which is exactly the thing they are made to correct.
Here is a statement from the board in my case. The court did not ever even pick up on this when they reviewed my Board Decisions.
I am to the point that I believe that the court or the board is using AI to write its briefs. They process thousands of request, and have to find a way to deny almost all of them.
There is no way a human would state such double speak and miss the idea that the military is supposed to protect those who are injured in what ever way, in honorable service.
--------------------
Certainly, your experience onboard the U.S.S. SIDES was an injustice and your resulting
mental health conditions are a tragedy. There simply is no injustice in the fact that you did not receive a medical
retirement as a result of your conditions, because your conditions never warranted referral to the
DES much less rendered you unfit for continued service. The Board also found no equitable
basis for relief in your case. In determining what constitutes equity, the Board is obligated to
consider not only what you should receive, but also what other similarly situated service
members are entitled to receive. The Board determined that no other similarly situated service
member would have been referred to the DES at the time even with the facts as they are now
known, nor would anyone be retroactively medically retired based upon similar facts.
Accordingly, the Board determined that there is no basis for relief based on equity. The Board
continues to regret the experience that you endured during your service onboard the U.S.S.
SIDES and the long-term effect that it has had upon your mental health. Finally, the Board members
recognized that you continued to serve the Navy honorably despite the trauma that you endured
onboard the U.S.S. SIDES. That, however, is the point. Medical retirements are intended only
for those service member unable to continue providing such honorable and effective service due
to a disqualifying medical condition. The Board regrettably found no basis to grant you the
medical retirement that you were never qualified to receive.