Good morning all,
I've mentioned this before in a previous post and would like to bring it up again, now that I have the letter in hand and waiting for my signature.
I was referred for possible MEB by the DAWG late last year for mental health and associated medication. For some background, I'm a 17-year AF E-6, meaning not far from retirement eligibility, but I'd prefer to separate, at this point. My mental health is rapidly deteriorating due to anxiety, depression, and PTSD, and it's in the best interest of the AF and my health for us to part ways. I do know what I'm giving up by not making 20 years, and I'm okay with that because honestly, I'm not sure if I'll make it there at this rate.
My commander informed me of his intention to recommend retention. Obviously, I disagree with his decision. I'm having trouble attaching the PDF, so here's his input. Apologies for the length but I figured the full context was necessary here:
II. EFFECT ON UNIT MISSION
1A. Can Airmen satisfactorily perform all primary AFSC in-garrison duties? YES
1B. Can Airman perform their primary duties in an austere/deployed environment? NO
CC Explanation of impact to perform primary AFSC duties/full scope of duties in future assignments and deployed locations:
TSgt XXXX is able to perform all in-garrison duties required of him and meets all expectations of his administrative and operational chains of command. That said, the member is disqualified from deployment and AFSC-specific overseas tours based on mental health diagnoses and medication. These conditions have led to the cancellation of three OCONUS assignments, which are part of a standard rotation of assignments for his AFSC. Additionally, TSgt XXXX's respiratory condition prevents him from donning a gas mask, and his hip, back, and ankle pain makes wearing PPE such as body armor difficult. Finally, ongoing hip, back, shoulder and ankle pain prevent him from sitting or standing for long periods of time.
2. Describe duties Airman is unableto perform because of their medical condition. Detail duty-related restrictions, limitations, work-arounds, or schedule modifications and how long they have been in effect.
TSgt XXXX's mental health conditions do not require any specific work restrictions or work modifications in garrison. Meanwhile, ongoing shoulder, hip, ankle and back pain make it challenging for the member to sit or stand for long periods of time, resulting in the member moving between a sitting and standing desk arrangement at his desk.
3. Days of work missed over the past 12 months due to their conditions. Specify how many were for what:
Ankle surgery convalescent leave and related appointments - 35 total days
Behavioral health appointments - 15 total days
Formal quarters - 4 total days
Physical therapy appointments - 6 total days
Other medical appointments - 5 total days
4. Have you spoken with the PCM and do you agree with their assessment of the Airman's condition? NO
With continuity of care so poor across the NCR, I instead engaged with the provider who evaluated TSgt XXXX in preparation for writing the NARSUM for this case. Col XXXX relayed that TSgt XXXX is not worldwide qualified and, following review of records and examination of member, assessed this as unlikely to change. I agree with this assessment, as well as the observation that, while challenging, it appears the member is able to perform all duties required of him at home station.
VI. COMMANDER'S RETENTION RECOMMENDATION
X. RETAIN
CC Comments:
TSgt XXXX is a strong NCO who leads exceptionally well on mission. He is meeting expectations and, in some cases, even exceeding expectations, across the board. Operational mission partners and Flight leadership under which the member works report no negative impact from TSgt XXXX's absences. It is clear to those who work the member closest that he is battling pain and feels that he is not able to do what is required of him to standards; however, the evidence before me indicates what he is doing to overcome challenges and limitations is in fact working. While he does not meet worldwide deployability criteria, the member can perform his primary duties in garrison. I support retention, to include retention with an assignment limitation code.
Apologies for the length; Adobe won't let me access the fields to delete PII and attach the document itself here.
In any case, this is definitely a retention recommendation though the commander admits he has some insight into my situation. Is there anything, anything at all, that I can do to sway AFPC/DP2NP to a full MEB decision? Currently, I have a reference letter from my ex-wife, which strongly recommends separation. I've requested copies of my MH records from the clinic, but I'm not really sure what else to do here. Lastly, I'm about to pay out of pocket for an evaluation from an outside psychologist to get a diagnostic second opinion. However, it still seems like the CC's letter will carry more weight than anything.
I'm kind of at my wit's end here so appreciate any help y'all can offer.
I've mentioned this before in a previous post and would like to bring it up again, now that I have the letter in hand and waiting for my signature.
I was referred for possible MEB by the DAWG late last year for mental health and associated medication. For some background, I'm a 17-year AF E-6, meaning not far from retirement eligibility, but I'd prefer to separate, at this point. My mental health is rapidly deteriorating due to anxiety, depression, and PTSD, and it's in the best interest of the AF and my health for us to part ways. I do know what I'm giving up by not making 20 years, and I'm okay with that because honestly, I'm not sure if I'll make it there at this rate.
My commander informed me of his intention to recommend retention. Obviously, I disagree with his decision. I'm having trouble attaching the PDF, so here's his input. Apologies for the length but I figured the full context was necessary here:
II. EFFECT ON UNIT MISSION
1A. Can Airmen satisfactorily perform all primary AFSC in-garrison duties? YES
1B. Can Airman perform their primary duties in an austere/deployed environment? NO
CC Explanation of impact to perform primary AFSC duties/full scope of duties in future assignments and deployed locations:
TSgt XXXX is able to perform all in-garrison duties required of him and meets all expectations of his administrative and operational chains of command. That said, the member is disqualified from deployment and AFSC-specific overseas tours based on mental health diagnoses and medication. These conditions have led to the cancellation of three OCONUS assignments, which are part of a standard rotation of assignments for his AFSC. Additionally, TSgt XXXX's respiratory condition prevents him from donning a gas mask, and his hip, back, and ankle pain makes wearing PPE such as body armor difficult. Finally, ongoing hip, back, shoulder and ankle pain prevent him from sitting or standing for long periods of time.
2. Describe duties Airman is unableto perform because of their medical condition. Detail duty-related restrictions, limitations, work-arounds, or schedule modifications and how long they have been in effect.
TSgt XXXX's mental health conditions do not require any specific work restrictions or work modifications in garrison. Meanwhile, ongoing shoulder, hip, ankle and back pain make it challenging for the member to sit or stand for long periods of time, resulting in the member moving between a sitting and standing desk arrangement at his desk.
3. Days of work missed over the past 12 months due to their conditions. Specify how many were for what:
Ankle surgery convalescent leave and related appointments - 35 total days
Behavioral health appointments - 15 total days
Formal quarters - 4 total days
Physical therapy appointments - 6 total days
Other medical appointments - 5 total days
4. Have you spoken with the PCM and do you agree with their assessment of the Airman's condition? NO
With continuity of care so poor across the NCR, I instead engaged with the provider who evaluated TSgt XXXX in preparation for writing the NARSUM for this case. Col XXXX relayed that TSgt XXXX is not worldwide qualified and, following review of records and examination of member, assessed this as unlikely to change. I agree with this assessment, as well as the observation that, while challenging, it appears the member is able to perform all duties required of him at home station.
VI. COMMANDER'S RETENTION RECOMMENDATION
X. RETAIN
CC Comments:
TSgt XXXX is a strong NCO who leads exceptionally well on mission. He is meeting expectations and, in some cases, even exceeding expectations, across the board. Operational mission partners and Flight leadership under which the member works report no negative impact from TSgt XXXX's absences. It is clear to those who work the member closest that he is battling pain and feels that he is not able to do what is required of him to standards; however, the evidence before me indicates what he is doing to overcome challenges and limitations is in fact working. While he does not meet worldwide deployability criteria, the member can perform his primary duties in garrison. I support retention, to include retention with an assignment limitation code.
Apologies for the length; Adobe won't let me access the fields to delete PII and attach the document itself here.
In any case, this is definitely a retention recommendation though the commander admits he has some insight into my situation. Is there anything, anything at all, that I can do to sway AFPC/DP2NP to a full MEB decision? Currently, I have a reference letter from my ex-wife, which strongly recommends separation. I've requested copies of my MH records from the clinic, but I'm not really sure what else to do here. Lastly, I'm about to pay out of pocket for an evaluation from an outside psychologist to get a diagnostic second opinion. However, it still seems like the CC's letter will carry more weight than anything.
I'm kind of at my wit's end here so appreciate any help y'all can offer.