Good afternoon all, I am pretty new to the forum and have been reading a lot here. But needed some advice from the "pros" on the forum. I know you guys can not give me 100% correct answers but personal experience will help ease my anxiety some. The "barracks Lawyers" all have different opinions. So here goes.
I am being referred to the board for three conditions, all for the same leg. But also have migraines that I have been diagnosed with and well documented in my medical record. I have tried multiple daily medicine, and abortive medicines with no help so far but continue to try new things. In my NMA my command touches briefly about how the migraines affect my ability to work. But since I wasn't referred to the board for them, my NARSUM doesn't mention anything about Migraines. My Nureo won't write an addendum, since we have tried everything possible to resolve them as of yet.
My question is, if the NMA mentions them but the NARSUM does not is there still a chance the the IPEB will find the Migraines unfitting? or will they not even consider looking at them since the NARSUM does not mention them?
I am being referred to the board for three conditions, all for the same leg. But also have migraines that I have been diagnosed with and well documented in my medical record. I have tried multiple daily medicine, and abortive medicines with no help so far but continue to try new things. In my NMA my command touches briefly about how the migraines affect my ability to work. But since I wasn't referred to the board for them, my NARSUM doesn't mention anything about Migraines. My Nureo won't write an addendum, since we have tried everything possible to resolve them as of yet.
My question is, if the NMA mentions them but the NARSUM does not is there still a chance the the IPEB will find the Migraines unfitting? or will they not even consider looking at them since the NARSUM does not mention them?