6 year limit of CRSC pay

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well of course they got it wrong, so we'll have to keep fighting. Today my husband received about 15k in back pay which does not conform to any known acceptable calculations. It's not even 6 years, much less the 17 they owe him. Originally they gave him zero back pay, but about $350 a month for his 20%. We have now gotten that $350 for 3 months in a row so I guess he'll continue to get that for the rest of his life. So the congressional inquiry will have to continue. The last time DFAS tried to give him 20k less than was owed for his correction of military records, we were able to get all of the paperwork and discuss it with the DFAS auditor. I will get back the Sen. Cruz's office and see if we can do the same thing. Can you think of any reason they would come up with such an odd number?
PM me his CRSC case number and last 4, I had someone else who had this happen to them and brought it up with my contact at HRC, haven't seen the retro pay yet, but HRC did correct that person's orders
 
Based on your factual recitation, it would appear that because your husband's eligibility for CRSC resulted from a record correction in 2023, he would be eligible for retroactive CRSC payments back to January 1, 2008. I recently had a client whose records were corrected by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records due to an order from the US Court of Federal Claims entered in 2023, retroactively placing him on the permanent disability retired list effective August 1, 2013. The client applied for CRSC based on that retroactive disability retirement. Once his claim was approved by Army HRC, DFAS paid CRSC retroactively back to 2013, subject to the CRSC cap.

As a general rule, veterans eligible for military disability retired pay pursuant to Chapter 61, U.S. Code with less than 20 years of active service, became eligible for CRSC effective January 1, 2008, assuming the veteran met the combat-related and VA rating requirements. See 10 U.S.C. § 1413a (the statutory authorization for CRSC); DoD 7000.14-R, Financial Management Regulation, Vol. 7B, Ch. 63 (June 2024) (the DoD regulation implementing the statutory authority).

Although not referenced in the text of either 10 U.S.C. § 1413a or the CRSC provisions of DoD 7000.14-R, a claim for a CRSC payment is subject to the six-year statute of limitations of the Baring Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3702. See Soto v. United States, 92 F.4th 1094 (Fed. Cir. 2024). Accordingly, the government is limited to paying CRSC for the period within six years after the claim accrues. In the CRSC context, claim accrual is the date upon which the veteran became eligible for CRSC, even if the veteran failed to submit a claim.

One exception to the time of claim accrual triggering the six-year limitations period involves a correction of records. If a veteran becomes eligible for CRSC due to a correction of the veteran’s military or naval records (through a lawsuit or correction board action), then the veteran’s claim for the CRSC payment accrues on the date of the record correction. See DoD 7000.14-R, Financial Management Regulation, Vol. 7B, Ch. 10, ¶ 2.3 (June 2024) (“2.3 Statute of Limitations. If a payment is due as a result of a correction of record, the claim for such payment accrues on the date of the correction. A claimant has 6 years from the date of the correction of record to claim the payment owed as a result of the correction of record.”). As a result, the calculation of the amount of any retroactive CRSC payment due would be based on the corrected date of CRSC eligibility resulting from the record correction action (typically the corrected, retroactive date of disability retirement) and would not be subject to the six-year statute of limitations except going forward from the date the court or correction board ordered the correction of record.

If you did not make the factual background regarding the correction of records clear in the CRSC application, you should supplement it to ensure that the service CRSC personnel and DFAS understand the reason for the retroactive effective date of the retirement, including copies of the court's decision, any implementing correction board record of proceeding, and a copy of DoD 7000.14-R, Financial Management Regulation, Vol. 7B, Ch. 10, ¶ 2.3. Otherwise, they may simply apply the six year statute of limitations without much thought.
Update. We won the 20% CRSC claim and they now give him about $350 per month until he dies. They gave zero back pay. We gave to to Ted Cruz. THEN my husband got 15k in his bank account yesterday. That makes no sense at all. It's not 6 years retro pay and it's definitely not 17 years. I apologize if this post is redundant but we are still looking for the correct amount and feel very grateful that another member here is looking into this for us. We appreciate any advice that you might have. Thank you.
 
Update. We won the 20% CRSC claim and they now give him about $350 per month until he dies. They gave zero back pay. We gave to to Ted Cruz. THEN my husband got 15k in his bank account yesterday. That makes no sense at all. It's not 6 years retro pay and it's definitely not 17 years. I apologize if this post is redundant but we are still looking for the correct amount and feel very grateful that another member here is looking into this for us. We appreciate any advice that you might have. Thank you.
Also, the bank statement says DFAS Cleveland RAVC. I'm not sure what that means but most people seems to think it is travel reimbursement, which makes no sense at all. Ted Cruz's office has not received any letter of explanation from DFAS or any replies since DFAS acknowledged the receipt of the request for an audit.
 
Hi Mike! Did you ever find out anything about my husband's case? We finally got an "audit" saying they were giving him 6 years retro pay (the 15k) MINUS "offsets" for VA and retired pay. WTH? They also said they "transposed" a number on his original retired pay so that might be the "offset" It's not very clear. Ironically, that's the EXACT thing DFAS said when they miscalculated his retro retired pay back in 2023 to the tuneof about 20k. The office of Ted Cruz has been useless this time around. Even if DFAS was confused about the correction of military records, the new ruling sealed the deal. We filed in February of 2025, long before the cut-off point for retro pay and we are still not getting any answers. Do you have any information that can help us? TIA
 
Update. We won the 20% CRSC claim and they now give him about $350 per month until he dies. They gave zero back pay. We gave to to Ted Cruz. THEN my husband got 15k in his bank account yesterday. That makes no sense at all. It's not 6 years retro pay and it's definitely not 17 years. I apologize if this post is redundant but we are still looking for the correct amount and feel very grateful that another member here is looking into this for us. We appreciate any advice that you might have. Thank you.
 
Hello again Retired Attorney. We finally got an "audit" saying they were giving him 6 years retro pay (the 15k) MINUS "offsets" for VA and retired pay. What? They also said they "transposed" a number on his original retired pay so that might be the "offset" It's not very clear. Ironically, that's the EXACT thing DFAS said when they miscalculated his retro retired pay back in 2023 to the tune of about 20k. The office of Ted Cruz has been useless this time around. They initiated an audit but didn't even get the paperwork DFAS sent to us and they don't seem to be pushing the point at all, even chiding us for contacting DFAS on our own. Even if DFAS was confused about the correction of military records, the new ruling sealed the deal. We filed in February of 2025, long before the cut-off point for retro pay and we are still not getting any answers. Do you have any information that can help us? TIA
 
Hi Mike! Did you ever find out anything about my husband's case? We finally got an "audit" saying they were giving him 6 years retro pay (the 15k) MINUS "offsets" for VA and retired pay. WTH? They also said they "transposed" a number on his original retired pay so that might be the "offset" It's not very clear. Ironically, that's the EXACT thing DFAS said when they miscalculated his retro retired pay back in 2023 to the tuneof about 20k. The office of Ted Cruz has been useless this time around. Even if DFAS was confused about the correction of military records, the new ruling sealed the deal. We filed in February of 2025, long before the cut-off point for retro pay and we are still not getting any answers. Do you have any information that can help us? TIA
I'm going to have to follow-up on that, I know they're going through all the former cases that have the Barring Statute statement in the approval memo, removing said statement. Which will then go to DFAS, and currently, they only have ONE analyst in the office thanks to the shutdown. Also, note, that the VA sometimes has some responsibility for retro pay as well and they "should" be doing an audit too
 
Hi Mike! Did you ever find out anything about my husband's case? We finally got an "audit" saying they were giving him 6 years retro pay (the 15k) MINUS "offsets" for VA and retired pay. WTH? They also said they "transposed" a number on his original retired pay so that might be the "offset" It's not very clear. Ironically, that's the EXACT thing DFAS said when they miscalculated his retro retired pay back in 2023 to the tuneof about 20k. The office of Ted Cruz has been useless this time around. Even if DFAS was confused about the correction of military records, the new ruling sealed the deal. We filed in February of 2025, long before the cut-off point for retro pay and we are still not getting any answers. Do you have any information that can help us? TIA
hey, i can only answer from my personal experience, i too had a correction of service records tbat would have put me eligible back 12 years at that time, but my back pay was still limited to 6 years
 
I'm going to have to follow-up on that, I know they're going through all the former cases that have the Barring Statute statement in the approval memo, removing said statement. Which will then go to DFAS, and currently, they only have ONE analyst in the office thanks to the shutdown. Also, note, that the VA sometimes has some responsibility for retro pay as well and they "should" be doing an audit too
Too bad, we need more people on this issue! Thank you Sir. We shall wait and see.
 
Too bad, we need more people on this issue! Thank you Sir. We shall wait and see.
I read an article that said in order to get those other years, the veteran would have apply for a reconsideration from the branch they applied to. Is there any truth to that? I surely hope not since they already know who is in line for the other years of pay. And we won't do anything right now since the congressional inquiry is still open.
 
I read an article that said in order to get those other years, the veteran would have apply for a reconsideration from the branch they applied to. Is there any truth to that? I surely hope not since they already know who is in line for the other years of pay. And we won't do anything right now since the congressional inquiry is still open.
Since your husband’s claim was received before 20 August 2025 even the Barring Statute for all those prior to that date is being removed, I saw my approval changed to reflect that, just waiting on DFAS to process it for the remaining amount, so tbh at this point I think it is a moot issue. I’d check iPERMS as I did not get an email notifying me of the new approval memo.
 
Since your husband’s claim was received before 20 August 2025 even the Barring Statute for all those prior to that date is being removed, I saw my approval changed to reflect that, just waiting on DFAS to process it for the remaining amount, so tbh at this point I think it is a moot issue. I’d check iPERMS as I did not get an email notifying me of the new approval memo.
I thought it would be easy to find iPERMS but no matter what browser I use it says the site is unsafe and when I click to go anyway, it takes me to some Army page that doesn't say iPERMS at all. How can I get into iPERMS safely and set up an account for him?
 
Since some people seem to have the overarching need to be condescending in this thread, I'm locking it. If someone has a question pertaining to this, you can PM me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top