He had written his letter at the beginning of the process. I was on a waiver but it was the generic waiver simply saying I was unable to deploy. This is what he used in his narrative. "Member is able to perform all in garrison duties with the exception of deployment." My profile has changed since then. My Dr. even put on the new profile that he didn't want me to arm up (I'm an SF troop), no strenuous activity causing me to become short of breath and no PT. When I asked him about changing his letter to reflect it, he flipped out and said he had tried helping me out by writing the letter and now I was saying it wasn't good enough. ????Well, last week I had my last appt with my Dr and PEBLO before they submitted the paperwork and they noticed his letter had gone over the 90 day mark, so he had to re-write it and add the additional findings. He flipped out again and thought I had put them up to it?? He only changed the date and sent it in like that. Sigh. So, my Dr. narrative says it impacts my duties, my superintendent wrote a letter and said the same, it effects my duties and career progression and so did another person I work with. My question is, is this going to affect the outcome? All 3 of the other people say it seriously impedes my progression and duties except for his.
. i would imagine a "reasonable" board member would look @ the package as a whole and make their baisis off of the med. documentation, primarily. plus when they look @ both of his letters they will clearly see that they r the same.
.
. i feel your pain, bro. like i said before i'm going through mine in the air nat. guard. i can't wait 2 bdone w/all this. i was active duty af sf and i've been in the guard 4 about 6yrs. (CATM). they really mess up my stuff. i have a letter from my "supervisor"/friend, my wife and my military and civ. PCM. i have'nt seen any documentation from my commander as of yet. can't wait 2 see that debocile
.